Thursday, April 21, 2005

Capitulation to special interests knows no bounds…

From the Palm Beach Post:

Feds' weather information could go dark
By Robert P. King
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Thursday, April 21, 2005

Do you want a seven-day weather forecast for your ZIP code? Or hour-by-hour predictions of the temperature, wind speed, humidity and chance of rain? Or weather data beamed to your cellphone?

That information is available for free from the National Weather Service.

But under a bill pending in the U.S. Senate, it might all disappear.

The bill, introduced last week by Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., would prohibit federal meteorologists from competing with companies such as AccuWeather and The Weather Channel, which offer their own forecasts through paid services and free ad-supported Web sites.

Supporters say the bill wouldn't hamper the weather service or the National Hurricane Center from alerting the public to hazards — in fact, it exempts forecasts meant to protect "life and property."

But critics say the bill's wording is so vague they can't tell exactly what it would ban.

"I believe I've paid for that data once. ... I don't want to have to pay for it again," said Scott Bradner, a technical consultant at Harvard University.

He says that as he reads the bill, a vast amount of federal weather data would be forced offline.

"The National Weather Service Web site would have to go away," Bradner said. "What would be permitted under this bill is not clear — it doesn't say. Even including hurricanes."


Really? This is really what we're talking about? We want to remove public access to information on the weather, information which was gathered using our tax money, so The Weather Channel can sell more ads on their website?

What the hell is going on in Congress?


-The Oklahoma Hippy

Click the link above to read the rest of the story.

2 comments:

  1. Nice blog! I'll be back.

    And oh, by the way.....AccuWeather is headquartered in State College, PA, the state in which Sen. Santorum (that frothy mixture) used to reside.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That doesn't surprise me in the least.

    ReplyDelete