Sunday, September 25, 2005

Greenspan Worried?

From CNN Money:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan told France's Finance Minister Thierry Breton the United States has "lost control" of its budget deficit, the French minister said Saturday.

"'We have lost control,' that was his expression," Breton told reporters after a bilateral meeting with Greenspan.

"The United States has lost control of their budget at a time when racking up deficits has been authorized without any control (from Congress)," Breton said.

"We were both disappointed that the management of debt is not a political priority today," he added.


But remember, the President thinks it would be irresponsible to repeal Paris Hilton's tax cut...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Greenspan Worried?

From CNN Money:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan told France's Finance Minister Thierry Breton the United States has "lost control" of its budget deficit, the French minister said Saturday.

"'We have lost control,' that was his expression," Breton told reporters after a bilateral meeting with Greenspan.

"The United States has lost control of their budget at a time when racking up deficits has been authorized without any control (from Congress)," Breton said.

"We were both disappointed that the management of debt is not a political priority today," he added.


But remember, the President thinks it would be irresponsible to repeal Paris Hilton's tax cut...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Saturday, September 24, 2005

How much power does the FBI need?

David Corn on the FBI's most recent attempt at a power grab:

With several key provisions of the controversial Patriot Act set to expire later this year, Congress has been working for months on legislation that would extend and perhaps restrict those provisions.

Most of the debate has concerned whether the Patriot Act went too far and has focused on the measure's Section 215, which allows the FBI to obtain library records and other "tangible things" in a terrorism or national security investigation by obtaining a warrant from the super-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.

But the FBI, with the presumed approval of the White House, has been pushing for power that would go beyond that of the controversial Section 215. In particular, the bureau has wanted the new Patriot Act measure to award it the right to issue administrative subpoenas. With an administrative subpoena, an FBI agent could--without going to a court or a grand jury--demand that a person or institution hand over any record on another person or organization: financial papers, health records, library records, e-mails and more. The order would be subject to judicial review only if the recipient--say, an Internet service provider--opposed the order. Administrative subpoenas would give the FBI greater power than Section 215 and national security letters. (With a national security letter, the FBI can, without bothering a court, obtain a limited set of information--certain financial documents, credit reports and Internet-use records. But a federal court last year declared national security letters unconstitutional. The Bush Administration has filed an appeal.) Moreover, as Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, notes, "The FBI wants this administrative subpoena power forever"--that is, with no sunset provision. Beating back the FBI's demand for this authority would be a victory for the civil liberties community. And so far, the FBI has been losing.


Wow. Even Hoover would have been amazed. The good news is that last sentence there. So far it's not working.

Read the full piece here. It's great stuff.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

How much power does the FBI need?

David Corn on the FBI's most recent attempt at a power grab:

With several key provisions of the controversial Patriot Act set to expire later this year, Congress has been working for months on legislation that would extend and perhaps restrict those provisions.

Most of the debate has concerned whether the Patriot Act went too far and has focused on the measure's Section 215, which allows the FBI to obtain library records and other "tangible things" in a terrorism or national security investigation by obtaining a warrant from the super-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.

But the FBI, with the presumed approval of the White House, has been pushing for power that would go beyond that of the controversial Section 215. In particular, the bureau has wanted the new Patriot Act measure to award it the right to issue administrative subpoenas. With an administrative subpoena, an FBI agent could--without going to a court or a grand jury--demand that a person or institution hand over any record on another person or organization: financial papers, health records, library records, e-mails and more. The order would be subject to judicial review only if the recipient--say, an Internet service provider--opposed the order. Administrative subpoenas would give the FBI greater power than Section 215 and national security letters. (With a national security letter, the FBI can, without bothering a court, obtain a limited set of information--certain financial documents, credit reports and Internet-use records. But a federal court last year declared national security letters unconstitutional. The Bush Administration has filed an appeal.) Moreover, as Kate Martin, director of the Center for National Security Studies, notes, "The FBI wants this administrative subpoena power forever"--that is, with no sunset provision. Beating back the FBI's demand for this authority would be a victory for the civil liberties community. And so far, the FBI has been losing.


Wow. Even Hoover would have been amazed. The good news is that last sentence there. So far it's not working.

Read the full piece here. It's great stuff.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Thursday, September 22, 2005

Chaos in Houston...

My sister-in-law and her husband live in Houston. They tried to evacuate last night at 10pm. At 3am they had made it a grand total of 5 miles on interstate 635. For those of you who know the area, they live on West Dallas St made it as far as Woodland Park. 5 hours folks.

It also occurred to them that they didn't have enough gas to make it anywhere. They couldn't buy any, because apparently every station is completely out.

These are not people without means. He is an accountant and she's a human resources manager in Houston. They have monetary means, but there is simply no way to evacuate.

We're going to keep them in our prayers and hope for the best.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Chaos in Houston...

My sister-in-law and her husband live in Houston. They tried to evacuate last night at 10pm. At 3am they had made it a grand total of 5 miles on interstate 635. For those of you who know the area, they live on West Dallas St made it as far as Woodland Park. 5 hours folks.

It also occurred to them that they didn't have enough gas to make it anywhere. They couldn't buy any, because apparently every station is completely out.

These are not people without means. He is an accountant and she's a human resources manager in Houston. They have monetary means, but there is simply no way to evacuate.

We're going to keep them in our prayers and hope for the best.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Well Well Well...

It's seems that Karl Rove has even more dirt on him showing up now...

From Tomorrow's Washington Post:

Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff bragged two years ago that he was in contact with White House political aide Karl Rove on behalf of a large, Bermuda-based corporation that wanted to avoid incurring some taxes and continue receiving federal contracts, according to a written statement by President Bush's nominee to be deputy attorney general.

Timothy E. Flanigan, general counsel for conglomerate Tyco International Ltd., said in a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week that Abramoff's lobbying firm initially boasted that Abramoff could help Tyco fend off a special liability tax because he "had good relationships with members of Congress," including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.).

Abramoff later said "he had contact with Mr. Karl Rove" about the issue, according to the statement by Flanigan, who oversaw Tyco's dealings with Abramoff and his firm and received reports from Abramoff about progress in the lobbying campaign. Flanigan's statement is the latest indication that Abramoff promoted himself as having ready access to senior officials in the Bush administration.

A White House spokeswoman, Erin Healy, said Rove "has no recollection" of being contacted by Abramoff about Tyco's concerns.


Now, either Jack Abramoff was lying, or Karl Rove is helping someone in the corporate world commit tax fraud and was peddling influence to secure federal contracts...

Naughty Karl.

Has he been indicted yet?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Well Well Well...

It's seems that Karl Rove has even more dirt on him showing up now...

From Tomorrow's Washington Post:

Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff bragged two years ago that he was in contact with White House political aide Karl Rove on behalf of a large, Bermuda-based corporation that wanted to avoid incurring some taxes and continue receiving federal contracts, according to a written statement by President Bush's nominee to be deputy attorney general.

Timothy E. Flanigan, general counsel for conglomerate Tyco International Ltd., said in a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week that Abramoff's lobbying firm initially boasted that Abramoff could help Tyco fend off a special liability tax because he "had good relationships with members of Congress," including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.).

Abramoff later said "he had contact with Mr. Karl Rove" about the issue, according to the statement by Flanigan, who oversaw Tyco's dealings with Abramoff and his firm and received reports from Abramoff about progress in the lobbying campaign. Flanigan's statement is the latest indication that Abramoff promoted himself as having ready access to senior officials in the Bush administration.

A White House spokeswoman, Erin Healy, said Rove "has no recollection" of being contacted by Abramoff about Tyco's concerns.


Now, either Jack Abramoff was lying, or Karl Rove is helping someone in the corporate world commit tax fraud and was peddling influence to secure federal contracts...

Naughty Karl.

Has he been indicted yet?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

See, I'm not the only saw Bush's shirt...

From Dan Froomkin's Live Online Chat at the Washington Post:

Manhattan, N.Y.: Have the White House PR folks lost their touch? The New Orleans speech, to me, looked downright spooky. Like a haunted house in the background.

Dan Froomkin: Ah, and there you have the downside of being image obsessed. Technically, I gather this was quite an accomplishment: Warm tungsten lights on the president, massive candlepower on the backdrop. But the net effect was not only bizarre but inappropriate. Throw in Bush's wooden delivery, his (possibly mis-buttoned) dress shirt, and you've got a rare but massive misstep by the masters of image manipulation. Almost up there with the glorious "Mission Accomplished" banner. But they bounced back from that one, and they may still bounce back from this one.


Perhaps the explanation is that he's been hitting the sauce:

Family sources have told how the 59-year-old president was caught by First Lady Laura downing a shot of booze at their family ranch in Crawford, Texas, when he learned of the hurricane disaster.

His worried wife yelled at him: "Stop, George."

Following the shocking incident, disclosed here for the first time, Laura privately warned her husband against "falling off the wagon" and vowed to travel with him more often so that she can keep an eye on Dubya, the sources add.

"When the levees broke in New Orleans, it apparently made him reach for a shot," said one insider. "He poured himself a Texas-sized shot of straight whiskey and tossed it back. The First Lady was shocked and shouted: "Stop George!"

"Laura gave him an ultimatum before, 'It's Jim Beam or me.' She doesn't want to replay that nightmare — especially now when it's such tough going for her husband."

Bush is under the worst pressure of his two terms in office and his popularity is near an all-time low. The handling of the Katrina crisis and troop losses in Iraq have fueled public discontent and pushed Bush back to drink.

A Washington source said: "The sad fact is that he has been sneaking drinks for weeks now. Laura may have only just caught him — but the word is his drinking has been going on for a while in the capital. He's been in a pressure cooker for months.

"The war in Iraq, the loss of American lives, has deeply affected him. He takes every soldier's life personally. It has left him emotionally drained.

The result is he's taking drinks here and there, likely in private, to cope. "And now with the worst domestic crisis in his administration over Katrina, you pray his drinking doesn't go out of control."

Another source said: "I'm only surprised to hear that he hadn't taken a shot sooner. Before Katrina, he was at his wit's end. I've known him for years. He's been a good ol' Texas boy forever. George had a drinking problem for years that most professionals would say needed therapy. He doesn't believe in it [therapy], he never got it. He drank his way through his youth, through college and well into his thirties. Everyone's drinking around him."

Another source said: "A family member told me they fear George is 'falling apart.' The First Lady has been assigned the job of gatekeeper."


Now, this is from the National Enquirer, which I admit leans towards sensationalism, but the things they print are generally true.

I've always seen President Bush as a dry drunk, because I recognize the alcoholic personality, especially in his inability to admit fault. He never went through the process of fighting his alcoholism, but rather stopped drinking. This is not the same thing.

Now it seems he has fallen off the wagon and turning to booze as a crutch.

May God have mercy on this country, because we're going to need it.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

See, I'm not the only saw Bush's shirt...

From Dan Froomkin's Live Online Chat at the Washington Post:

Manhattan, N.Y.: Have the White House PR folks lost their touch? The New Orleans speech, to me, looked downright spooky. Like a haunted house in the background.

Dan Froomkin: Ah, and there you have the downside of being image obsessed. Technically, I gather this was quite an accomplishment: Warm tungsten lights on the president, massive candlepower on the backdrop. But the net effect was not only bizarre but inappropriate. Throw in Bush's wooden delivery, his (possibly mis-buttoned) dress shirt, and you've got a rare but massive misstep by the masters of image manipulation. Almost up there with the glorious "Mission Accomplished" banner. But they bounced back from that one, and they may still bounce back from this one.


Perhaps the explanation is that he's been hitting the sauce:

Family sources have told how the 59-year-old president was caught by First Lady Laura downing a shot of booze at their family ranch in Crawford, Texas, when he learned of the hurricane disaster.

His worried wife yelled at him: "Stop, George."

Following the shocking incident, disclosed here for the first time, Laura privately warned her husband against "falling off the wagon" and vowed to travel with him more often so that she can keep an eye on Dubya, the sources add.

"When the levees broke in New Orleans, it apparently made him reach for a shot," said one insider. "He poured himself a Texas-sized shot of straight whiskey and tossed it back. The First Lady was shocked and shouted: "Stop George!"

"Laura gave him an ultimatum before, 'It's Jim Beam or me.' She doesn't want to replay that nightmare — especially now when it's such tough going for her husband."

Bush is under the worst pressure of his two terms in office and his popularity is near an all-time low. The handling of the Katrina crisis and troop losses in Iraq have fueled public discontent and pushed Bush back to drink.

A Washington source said: "The sad fact is that he has been sneaking drinks for weeks now. Laura may have only just caught him — but the word is his drinking has been going on for a while in the capital. He's been in a pressure cooker for months.

"The war in Iraq, the loss of American lives, has deeply affected him. He takes every soldier's life personally. It has left him emotionally drained.

The result is he's taking drinks here and there, likely in private, to cope. "And now with the worst domestic crisis in his administration over Katrina, you pray his drinking doesn't go out of control."

Another source said: "I'm only surprised to hear that he hadn't taken a shot sooner. Before Katrina, he was at his wit's end. I've known him for years. He's been a good ol' Texas boy forever. George had a drinking problem for years that most professionals would say needed therapy. He doesn't believe in it [therapy], he never got it. He drank his way through his youth, through college and well into his thirties. Everyone's drinking around him."

Another source said: "A family member told me they fear George is 'falling apart.' The First Lady has been assigned the job of gatekeeper."


Now, this is from the National Enquirer, which I admit leans towards sensationalism, but the things they print are generally true.

I've always seen President Bush as a dry drunk, because I recognize the alcoholic personality, especially in his inability to admit fault. He never went through the process of fighting his alcoholism, but rather stopped drinking. This is not the same thing.

Now it seems he has fallen off the wagon and turning to booze as a crutch.

May God have mercy on this country, because we're going to need it.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Monday, September 19, 2005

Confirm Roberts...

I know that this isn't a popular position among Democrats right now, but frankly their wrong.

My initial impression of John Roberts was one of cautious optimism. You can read that post here.

My conclusions there have been pretty much reaffirmed, and I am comfortable with John Roberts as Chief Justice.

Bull Moose puts it even better than I can:

One Cheer for Roberts


Senator Moose would vote to confirm Roberts.*

The Moose knew of Judges Bork, Thomas and Scalia, although he was not their friend. And John Roberts is no Bork, Thomas or Scalia. Roberts has shown that he is no originalist extremist. He is apparently respectful of precedent. He has a modestly expansionist view of the commerce clause - he does not view the welfare state as unconstitutional. And he acknowledges a right to privacy. In sum, Roberts is a conventional conservative not a right wing revolutionary jurist.

People for the American Way knows this. The American people know this. The Family Research Council knows this. Ted Kennedy knows this. Sam Brownback knows this. And they will all take their predictable side on the question of his confirmation.

John Roberts is not the Moose's cup of tea. He will undoubtedly be far too deferential to corporate power. But, alas, his candidate for the Presidency lost. And one of the consequences of an election is that the winner chooses Supreme Court vacancies. The view from this bench is that the President gets the benefit of the doubt on nominations - elections have consequences. Make no mistake - the vacancy will be filled and Roberts is the best we will get from this President.


Am I rejoicing from the hill tops that the next Chief Justice is John Roberts? No. Do I think it's a cataclysm? Absolutely not.

He's a brilliant jurist and a well reasoned man. He couldn't be more qualified. I wish that he had just answered more questions than he did, because honestly, given the nature of the questions being asked, he could have made mincemeat of any senator on the committee at will.

He knew he was going to be confirmed no matter what, he might as well have been completely forthcoming with his views and positions as they relate to matters of law.

Still, he's as good as we're going to get from this President, and I respect John Robert's mind.

If I were voting, I would vote to confirm.

Flame away.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Confirm Roberts...

I know that this isn't a popular position among Democrats right now, but frankly their wrong.

My initial impression of John Roberts was one of cautious optimism. You can read that post here.

My conclusions there have been pretty much reaffirmed, and I am comfortable with John Roberts as Chief Justice.

Bull Moose puts it even better than I can:

One Cheer for Roberts


Senator Moose would vote to confirm Roberts.*

The Moose knew of Judges Bork, Thomas and Scalia, although he was not their friend. And John Roberts is no Bork, Thomas or Scalia. Roberts has shown that he is no originalist extremist. He is apparently respectful of precedent. He has a modestly expansionist view of the commerce clause - he does not view the welfare state as unconstitutional. And he acknowledges a right to privacy. In sum, Roberts is a conventional conservative not a right wing revolutionary jurist.

People for the American Way knows this. The American people know this. The Family Research Council knows this. Ted Kennedy knows this. Sam Brownback knows this. And they will all take their predictable side on the question of his confirmation.

John Roberts is not the Moose's cup of tea. He will undoubtedly be far too deferential to corporate power. But, alas, his candidate for the Presidency lost. And one of the consequences of an election is that the winner chooses Supreme Court vacancies. The view from this bench is that the President gets the benefit of the doubt on nominations - elections have consequences. Make no mistake - the vacancy will be filled and Roberts is the best we will get from this President.


Am I rejoicing from the hill tops that the next Chief Justice is John Roberts? No. Do I think it's a cataclysm? Absolutely not.

He's a brilliant jurist and a well reasoned man. He couldn't be more qualified. I wish that he had just answered more questions than he did, because honestly, given the nature of the questions being asked, he could have made mincemeat of any senator on the committee at will.

He knew he was going to be confirmed no matter what, he might as well have been completely forthcoming with his views and positions as they relate to matters of law.

Still, he's as good as we're going to get from this President, and I respect John Robert's mind.

If I were voting, I would vote to confirm.

Flame away.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

49 years after the first man walked on the moon...

...we hope to put 4 men on the moon.

What an unbelievable waste of our resources. How about we send men to explore the moon again when everyone in this country has health insurance?

Just a thought.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

49 years after the first man walked on the moon...

...we hope to put 4 men on the moon.

What an unbelievable waste of our resources. How about we send men to explore the moon again when everyone in this country has health insurance?

Just a thought.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Thursday, September 15, 2005

How can we have confidence in this man to run the country...




...when he can't even button his shirt correctly?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

How can we have confidence in this man to run the country...




...when he can't even button his shirt correctly?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Let's play a drinking game...

After the President’s speech tonight, watch the news…

If you hear someone recite something off of this list of talking points, take a drink.

Try not to die from alcohol poisoning.

Enjoy the game…

Right-Wing Talking Points on Katrina Speech

Think Progress obtained the following talking points on President Bush’s primetime speech on Katrina tonight that were distributed to right-wing pundits. The text is as follows:

++++++++++

President Katrina Speech Talkers:

* America and the Gulf Coast are recovering from one of the greatest natural disasters this country has ever faced.

* Tonight President Bush will talk about how there is some optimism that we can see as we move forward. We’re going to build a better Gulf Coast, a better New Orleans and we’ll work with local officials to make sure that happens.

* This will be a massive funding effort at every level of government. We shouldn’t just look at government - we’re seeing private charities, and the American people’s enormous compassion.

* There were breakdowns of communication and planning at all levels of government - federal, state and local levels. It is very critical we learn why those breakdowns took place in the first place.

* Many parts of this will be chalked up to the fact it was one of the worst storms our country has ever faced. But there were things in a post-9/11 world that our government at all levels should be doing better and President Bush more than anybody else wants to find out why it took place and how it took place to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

* Bottom line now is all levels of government must take responsibility. This President is taking responsibility and what we have to do now is look forward.

* Senator Frist and Speaker Hastert have indicated that Congress will conduct a thorough investigation modeled after some of the most serious investigations that Congress has ever undertaken: the 1973 Watergate Committee, the 1987 Iran Contra Committee, the 1994 and 1995 Whitewater Committees and the 1997 Campaign Finance investigation.

* Tonight President Bush will talk about specifically what we’ll talk about to help these tens of thousands of people who are literally living with only the shirts of their backs spread out throughout the country. We have to have a strategy for education and heath care, and he’ll spell those out.

* It’s wrong to say it’s either winning the war on terror or funding aftermath of Katrina. We have to do both that means we’ll have to cut spending where else to make sure we are fiscally prudent with the taxpayer’s dollars.

* There’s always discussion about raising taxes but right when businesses and people are trying to get back on their feet in the gulf coast region, the worst thing we can do with these families is pop them with another tax.

* This is going to require difficult decisions in Washington. It’s going to be important that we don’t have the same ol’ same ol’ that we see in Washington. Tough choices will be to have made and President Bush is willing to do that.


Play Responsibly...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Let's play a drinking game...

After the President’s speech tonight, watch the news…

If you hear someone recite something off of this list of talking points, take a drink.

Try not to die from alcohol poisoning.

Enjoy the game…

Right-Wing Talking Points on Katrina Speech

Think Progress obtained the following talking points on President Bush’s primetime speech on Katrina tonight that were distributed to right-wing pundits. The text is as follows:

++++++++++

President Katrina Speech Talkers:

* America and the Gulf Coast are recovering from one of the greatest natural disasters this country has ever faced.

* Tonight President Bush will talk about how there is some optimism that we can see as we move forward. We’re going to build a better Gulf Coast, a better New Orleans and we’ll work with local officials to make sure that happens.

* This will be a massive funding effort at every level of government. We shouldn’t just look at government - we’re seeing private charities, and the American people’s enormous compassion.

* There were breakdowns of communication and planning at all levels of government - federal, state and local levels. It is very critical we learn why those breakdowns took place in the first place.

* Many parts of this will be chalked up to the fact it was one of the worst storms our country has ever faced. But there were things in a post-9/11 world that our government at all levels should be doing better and President Bush more than anybody else wants to find out why it took place and how it took place to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

* Bottom line now is all levels of government must take responsibility. This President is taking responsibility and what we have to do now is look forward.

* Senator Frist and Speaker Hastert have indicated that Congress will conduct a thorough investigation modeled after some of the most serious investigations that Congress has ever undertaken: the 1973 Watergate Committee, the 1987 Iran Contra Committee, the 1994 and 1995 Whitewater Committees and the 1997 Campaign Finance investigation.

* Tonight President Bush will talk about specifically what we’ll talk about to help these tens of thousands of people who are literally living with only the shirts of their backs spread out throughout the country. We have to have a strategy for education and heath care, and he’ll spell those out.

* It’s wrong to say it’s either winning the war on terror or funding aftermath of Katrina. We have to do both that means we’ll have to cut spending where else to make sure we are fiscally prudent with the taxpayer’s dollars.

* There’s always discussion about raising taxes but right when businesses and people are trying to get back on their feet in the gulf coast region, the worst thing we can do with these families is pop them with another tax.

* This is going to require difficult decisions in Washington. It’s going to be important that we don’t have the same ol’ same ol’ that we see in Washington. Tough choices will be to have made and President Bush is willing to do that.


Play Responsibly...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Monday, September 12, 2005

Mike Brown Resigns...

AP is reporting that Mike Brown has resigned as the head of FEMA. Appearently the political operation in the White House wanted him to wait until reporters were paying attention to the Roberts Hearings...

It didn't work. This is still going to be a big deal.

WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal Emergency Management Agency director Mike Brown said Monday he has resigned "in the best interest of the agency and best interest of the president," three days after losing his onsite command of the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

"The focus has got to be on FEMA, what the people are trying to do down there," Brown told The Associated Press.

His decision was not a surprise. Brown was abruptly recalled to Washington on Friday, a clear vote of no confidence from his superiors at the White House and the Department of Homeland Security. Brown had been roundly criticized for FEMA's bearish response to the hurricane, which has caused political problem for Bush and fellow Republicans.

"I'm turning in my resignation today," Brown said. "I think it's in the best interest of the agency and the best interest of the president to do that and get the media focused on the good things that are going on, instead of me."


The link is here.

So, now the question is why didn't the President just fire him?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Mike Brown Resigns...

AP is reporting that Mike Brown has resigned as the head of FEMA. Appearently the political operation in the White House wanted him to wait until reporters were paying attention to the Roberts Hearings...

It didn't work. This is still going to be a big deal.

WASHINGTON (AP) - Federal Emergency Management Agency director Mike Brown said Monday he has resigned "in the best interest of the agency and best interest of the president," three days after losing his onsite command of the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

"The focus has got to be on FEMA, what the people are trying to do down there," Brown told The Associated Press.

His decision was not a surprise. Brown was abruptly recalled to Washington on Friday, a clear vote of no confidence from his superiors at the White House and the Department of Homeland Security. Brown had been roundly criticized for FEMA's bearish response to the hurricane, which has caused political problem for Bush and fellow Republicans.

"I'm turning in my resignation today," Brown said. "I think it's in the best interest of the agency and the best interest of the president to do that and get the media focused on the good things that are going on, instead of me."


The link is here.

So, now the question is why didn't the President just fire him?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

This is about right too...



Would you like to hear Free Bird?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

This is about right too...



Would you like to hear Free Bird?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Bush's Vacation























Indeed.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Bush's Vacation























Indeed.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

"An emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us."

The Republican Party invented the President they wanted to hide the President they had. If that isn't clear by now, then you are either a sycophantically irrational apologist for an administration that has show nothing but incompetence, or you have been living on Mars for the past 5 years.

The first 8 months of the Bush's Presidency was a whole lot of nothing. He is an unappealing man with no intellectual curiosity. He wanted to be President the way most people would a sideline pass to the Super Bowl.

The Republican Party and the group of men picked to work in the White House and manage the President were having no success with their agenda, and they knew that if people's perception of President Bush didn't change, they were never going to be able to sell the public on the planned War in Iraq.

Then came September 11th. After a day of running around like a scared little bitch, the President comes back to Washington and Karl Rove starts to plan for the war and reelection.

Step One: Have Bush start acting like a drunken frat boy looking for some assess to kick. Since the vast majority of Americans, myself included, were looking for him to do exactly that, it worked out quite well. The tragedy was that going after Afghanistan was just a way of buying time before going into Iraq. That' why Osama Bin Laden is still walking around somewhere.

Step Two: Convince people the threat was on a global scale, so that we would jump at every shadow we encountered for a long time. Yeah, their cave dwellers, but they are ninja like cave-dwellers with global reach... Yeah.

Step Three: Inoculate President Bush from any sort of criticism by manipulating the national unity and sense of patriotism people felt after September 11th, 2001 to paint any critic of the President or his policies as some sort of traitor.

Step Four: Insinuate that every Democrat is too big of an effeminate girlie man to adequately deal with the Global Boogie man that is trying to kill all of us. I mean come on, the idea that Al-Qaeda wants Kerry to look French or some nonsense was the Zeitgeist of the 2004 election. Anyone remember the new tactic of "Swiftboating?"

Step Five: Shift the focus as quickly as possible to Iraq, and downplay the significance of any other threat the United States as irrelevant in the face of the destructive power that could be unleashed by the destitute and broken country of Iraq.

That was Karl Rove's five point plan, and the media allowed them to achieve it by being to afraid to ask the relevant questions that should be asked before the world's shining example of a liberal democracy starts a war of choice on a much smaller country.

That's how we ended up here. Karl Rove and his fellow Ministers of Propaganda worked the country up into a frenzied mob and kept it there until after Bush had achieved reelection.

Now, with so many of the players in this drama having moved to the private sector, the President was caught unawares again, but this time no amount of spin or disinformation was going to get him an accountability shield the second time around.

Dan Froomkin also sees the "Real Bush" in the aftermath of Katrina, and as he quite succinctly puts it, "an emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us."

From Today's White House Briefing Column:

Amid a slew of stories this weekend about the embattled presidency and the blundering government response to the drowning of New Orleans, some journalists who are long-time observers of the White House are suddenly sharing scathing observations about President Bush that may be new to many of their readers.

Is Bush the commanding, decisive, jovial president you've been hearing about for years in so much of the mainstream press?

Maybe not so much.

Judging from the blistering analyses in Time, Newsweek, and elsewhere these past few days, it turns out that Bush is in fact fidgety, cold and snappish in private. He yells at those who dare give him bad news and is therefore not surprisingly surrounded by an echo chamber of terrified sycophants. He is slow to comprehend concepts that don't emerge from his gut. He is uncomprehending of the speeches that he is given to read. And oh yes, one of his most significant legacies -- the immense post-Sept. 11 reorganization of the federal government which created the Homeland Security Department -- has failed a big test.

Maybe it's Bush's sinking poll numbers -- he is, after all, undeniably an unpopular president now. Maybe it's the way that the federal response to the flood has cut so deeply against Bush's most compelling claim to greatness: His resoluteness when it comes to protecting Americans.

But for whatever reason, critical observations and insights that for so long have been zealously guarded by mainstream journalists, and only doled out in teaspoons if at all, now seem to be flooding into the public sphere.

An emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us.


I am still just dumbfounded that in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks, we were willing to put away the lessons of Watergate, and give a presumption of truthfulness and nobility to an American President, much less one who's media message is controlled by someone as dirty and foul as Karl Rove.

While the media seems to have gotten over it for the time being, I can't help but wonder what will happen in the future that will cause them to stow their necessary cynicism away once again.

It's just too bad that it took the Bush Administration's indifference to the plight of tens of thousands of people stuck in a city that everyone knew was about to be submerged by a Hurricane of epic proportions.

Don't worry though, he'll be sure to get rid of the estate tax to make up for it.

Disgusting. If it weren't for the prospect of President Cheney, I would be calling for Bush's resignation.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

"An emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us."

The Republican Party invented the President they wanted to hide the President they had. If that isn't clear by now, then you are either a sycophantically irrational apologist for an administration that has show nothing but incompetence, or you have been living on Mars for the past 5 years.

The first 8 months of the Bush's Presidency was a whole lot of nothing. He is an unappealing man with no intellectual curiosity. He wanted to be President the way most people would a sideline pass to the Super Bowl.

The Republican Party and the group of men picked to work in the White House and manage the President were having no success with their agenda, and they knew that if people's perception of President Bush didn't change, they were never going to be able to sell the public on the planned War in Iraq.

Then came September 11th. After a day of running around like a scared little bitch, the President comes back to Washington and Karl Rove starts to plan for the war and reelection.

Step One: Have Bush start acting like a drunken frat boy looking for some assess to kick. Since the vast majority of Americans, myself included, were looking for him to do exactly that, it worked out quite well. The tragedy was that going after Afghanistan was just a way of buying time before going into Iraq. That' why Osama Bin Laden is still walking around somewhere.

Step Two: Convince people the threat was on a global scale, so that we would jump at every shadow we encountered for a long time. Yeah, their cave dwellers, but they are ninja like cave-dwellers with global reach... Yeah.

Step Three: Inoculate President Bush from any sort of criticism by manipulating the national unity and sense of patriotism people felt after September 11th, 2001 to paint any critic of the President or his policies as some sort of traitor.

Step Four: Insinuate that every Democrat is too big of an effeminate girlie man to adequately deal with the Global Boogie man that is trying to kill all of us. I mean come on, the idea that Al-Qaeda wants Kerry to look French or some nonsense was the Zeitgeist of the 2004 election. Anyone remember the new tactic of "Swiftboating?"

Step Five: Shift the focus as quickly as possible to Iraq, and downplay the significance of any other threat the United States as irrelevant in the face of the destructive power that could be unleashed by the destitute and broken country of Iraq.

That was Karl Rove's five point plan, and the media allowed them to achieve it by being to afraid to ask the relevant questions that should be asked before the world's shining example of a liberal democracy starts a war of choice on a much smaller country.

That's how we ended up here. Karl Rove and his fellow Ministers of Propaganda worked the country up into a frenzied mob and kept it there until after Bush had achieved reelection.

Now, with so many of the players in this drama having moved to the private sector, the President was caught unawares again, but this time no amount of spin or disinformation was going to get him an accountability shield the second time around.

Dan Froomkin also sees the "Real Bush" in the aftermath of Katrina, and as he quite succinctly puts it, "an emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us."

From Today's White House Briefing Column:

Amid a slew of stories this weekend about the embattled presidency and the blundering government response to the drowning of New Orleans, some journalists who are long-time observers of the White House are suddenly sharing scathing observations about President Bush that may be new to many of their readers.

Is Bush the commanding, decisive, jovial president you've been hearing about for years in so much of the mainstream press?

Maybe not so much.

Judging from the blistering analyses in Time, Newsweek, and elsewhere these past few days, it turns out that Bush is in fact fidgety, cold and snappish in private. He yells at those who dare give him bad news and is therefore not surprisingly surrounded by an echo chamber of terrified sycophants. He is slow to comprehend concepts that don't emerge from his gut. He is uncomprehending of the speeches that he is given to read. And oh yes, one of his most significant legacies -- the immense post-Sept. 11 reorganization of the federal government which created the Homeland Security Department -- has failed a big test.

Maybe it's Bush's sinking poll numbers -- he is, after all, undeniably an unpopular president now. Maybe it's the way that the federal response to the flood has cut so deeply against Bush's most compelling claim to greatness: His resoluteness when it comes to protecting Americans.

But for whatever reason, critical observations and insights that for so long have been zealously guarded by mainstream journalists, and only doled out in teaspoons if at all, now seem to be flooding into the public sphere.

An emperor-has-no-clothes moment seems upon us.


I am still just dumbfounded that in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks, we were willing to put away the lessons of Watergate, and give a presumption of truthfulness and nobility to an American President, much less one who's media message is controlled by someone as dirty and foul as Karl Rove.

While the media seems to have gotten over it for the time being, I can't help but wonder what will happen in the future that will cause them to stow their necessary cynicism away once again.

It's just too bad that it took the Bush Administration's indifference to the plight of tens of thousands of people stuck in a city that everyone knew was about to be submerged by a Hurricane of epic proportions.

Don't worry though, he'll be sure to get rid of the estate tax to make up for it.

Disgusting. If it weren't for the prospect of President Cheney, I would be calling for Bush's resignation.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Sunday, September 11, 2005

Newsweek Publishes Katrina Post-Mortem...

Newsweek explores the how and why of what went wrong. It's absolutely devastating for Bush. I wonder which aide is going to tell him about this story?

Sept. 19, 2005 issue - It's a standing joke among the president's top aides: who gets to deliver the bad news? Warm and hearty in public, Bush can be cold and snappish in private, and aides sometimes cringe before the displeasure of the president of the United States, or, as he is known in West Wing jargon, POTUS. The bad news on this early morning, Tuesday, Aug. 30, some 24 hours after Hurricane Katrina had ripped through New Orleans, was that the president would have to cut short his five-week vacation by a couple of days and return to Washington. The president's chief of staff, Andrew Card; his deputy chief of staff, Joe Hagin; his counselor, Dan Bartlett, and his spokesman, Scott McClellan, held a conference call to discuss the question of the president's early return and the delicate task of telling him. Hagin, it was decided, as senior aide on the ground, would do the deed.

The president did not growl this time. He had already decided to return to Washington and hold a meeting of his top advisers on the following day, Wednesday. This would give them a day to get back from their vacations and their staffs to work up some ideas about what to do in the aftermath of the storm. President Bush knew the storm and its consequences had been bad; but he didn't quite realize how bad.

The reality, say several aides who did not wish to be quoted because it might displease the president, did not really sink in until Thursday night. Some White House staffers were watching the evening news and thought the president needed to see the horrific reports coming out of New Orleans. Counselor Bartlett made up a DVD of the newscasts so Bush could see them in their entirety as he flew down to the Gulf Coast the next morning on Air Force One.

How this could be—how the president of the United States could have even less "situational awareness," as they say in the military, than the average American about the worst natural disaster in a century—is one of the more perplexing and troubling chapters in a story that, despite moments of heroism and acts of great generosity, ranks as a national disgrace.


The idea that he didn't know what was going on because he hadn't watched the news is an absolutely damning indictment of the man who claimed only he was capable of keeping us safe. The idea that Dan Bartlett had to make a DVD of news broadcasts before the President could get what was going on makes me physically ill.

Why hadn't he been attempting to get ahold of the people on the ground? Why hadn't the President contacted Chertoff and asked for an assessment of the situation on the ground, and to ascertain if all available resources were being used?

Read the entire piece, and ask yourself who was asleep on the job. Was it the Governor of Louisiana or the Mayor of New Orleans? Or was it the President who had to watch a DVD of the news before he got it?

Worst President Ever. I would say that the President should resign, but I just don't know how this country could deal with President Cheney.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Newsweek Publishes Katrina Post-Mortem...

Newsweek explores the how and why of what went wrong. It's absolutely devastating for Bush. I wonder which aide is going to tell him about this story?

Sept. 19, 2005 issue - It's a standing joke among the president's top aides: who gets to deliver the bad news? Warm and hearty in public, Bush can be cold and snappish in private, and aides sometimes cringe before the displeasure of the president of the United States, or, as he is known in West Wing jargon, POTUS. The bad news on this early morning, Tuesday, Aug. 30, some 24 hours after Hurricane Katrina had ripped through New Orleans, was that the president would have to cut short his five-week vacation by a couple of days and return to Washington. The president's chief of staff, Andrew Card; his deputy chief of staff, Joe Hagin; his counselor, Dan Bartlett, and his spokesman, Scott McClellan, held a conference call to discuss the question of the president's early return and the delicate task of telling him. Hagin, it was decided, as senior aide on the ground, would do the deed.

The president did not growl this time. He had already decided to return to Washington and hold a meeting of his top advisers on the following day, Wednesday. This would give them a day to get back from their vacations and their staffs to work up some ideas about what to do in the aftermath of the storm. President Bush knew the storm and its consequences had been bad; but he didn't quite realize how bad.

The reality, say several aides who did not wish to be quoted because it might displease the president, did not really sink in until Thursday night. Some White House staffers were watching the evening news and thought the president needed to see the horrific reports coming out of New Orleans. Counselor Bartlett made up a DVD of the newscasts so Bush could see them in their entirety as he flew down to the Gulf Coast the next morning on Air Force One.

How this could be—how the president of the United States could have even less "situational awareness," as they say in the military, than the average American about the worst natural disaster in a century—is one of the more perplexing and troubling chapters in a story that, despite moments of heroism and acts of great generosity, ranks as a national disgrace.


The idea that he didn't know what was going on because he hadn't watched the news is an absolutely damning indictment of the man who claimed only he was capable of keeping us safe. The idea that Dan Bartlett had to make a DVD of news broadcasts before the President could get what was going on makes me physically ill.

Why hadn't he been attempting to get ahold of the people on the ground? Why hadn't the President contacted Chertoff and asked for an assessment of the situation on the ground, and to ascertain if all available resources were being used?

Read the entire piece, and ask yourself who was asleep on the job. Was it the Governor of Louisiana or the Mayor of New Orleans? Or was it the President who had to watch a DVD of the news before he got it?

Worst President Ever. I would say that the President should resign, but I just don't know how this country could deal with President Cheney.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Saturday, September 10, 2005

Dear Jesus, Help Us All...

From Sunday's Washington Post:

The Pentagon has drafted a revised doctrine for the use of nuclear weapons that envisions commanders requesting presidential approval to use them to preempt an attack by a nation or a terrorist group using weapons of mass destruction. The draft also includes the option of using nuclear arms to destroy known enemy stockpiles of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.

The document, written by the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs staff but not yet finally approved by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, would update rules and procedures governing use of nuclear weapons to reflect a preemption strategy first announced by the Bush White House in December 2002. The strategy was outlined in more detail at the time in classified national security directives.

At a White House briefing that year, a spokesman said the United States would "respond with overwhelming force" to the use of weapons of mass destruction against the United States, its forces or allies, and said "all options" would be available to the president.

The draft, dated March 15, would provide authoritative guidance for commanders to request presidential approval for using nuclear weapons, and represents the Pentagon's first attempt to revise procedures to reflect the Bush preemption doctrine. A previous version, completed in 1995 during the Clinton administration, contains no mention of using nuclear weapons preemptively or specifically against threats from weapons of mass destruction.


Don't doubt for a second that the President would sign off on a request to do exactly this... May God have mercy on all of us...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Dear Jesus, Help Us All...

From Sunday's Washington Post:

The Pentagon has drafted a revised doctrine for the use of nuclear weapons that envisions commanders requesting presidential approval to use them to preempt an attack by a nation or a terrorist group using weapons of mass destruction. The draft also includes the option of using nuclear arms to destroy known enemy stockpiles of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.

The document, written by the Pentagon's Joint Chiefs staff but not yet finally approved by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, would update rules and procedures governing use of nuclear weapons to reflect a preemption strategy first announced by the Bush White House in December 2002. The strategy was outlined in more detail at the time in classified national security directives.

At a White House briefing that year, a spokesman said the United States would "respond with overwhelming force" to the use of weapons of mass destruction against the United States, its forces or allies, and said "all options" would be available to the president.

The draft, dated March 15, would provide authoritative guidance for commanders to request presidential approval for using nuclear weapons, and represents the Pentagon's first attempt to revise procedures to reflect the Bush preemption doctrine. A previous version, completed in 1995 during the Clinton administration, contains no mention of using nuclear weapons preemptively or specifically against threats from weapons of mass destruction.


Don't doubt for a second that the President would sign off on a request to do exactly this... May God have mercy on all of us...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Friday, September 9, 2005

Is the padded resume just a lame cover?

From Mark Schmitt via Talking Points Memo Cafe:

I wouldn't be surprised if some of the stories about FEMA Director Michael Brown's padded resume were being released for the sole purpose of giving some cover to the White House in firing him: "The President is extremely disappointed that Brownie, umm, Mr. Brown, represented himself as holding qualifications he did not hold, and the President will not tolerate anything other than complete forthrightness," Scotty will say, presenting the president as the Stockard Channing character in Six Degrees of Separation.

But it's actually more like Bernie Kerik's nonexistent "nanny problem" because, in reality, Brown's resume wasn't all that padded. Sure he changed "Assistant to the City Manager" to "Assistant City Manager," added a couple of honors he hadn't gotten, and made it sound like he'd been practicing some law when he hadn't. But a real resume padder adds a couple of degrees from Stanford and a stint in Special Forces.

The important point is this: Even if every single thing on Brown's resume was true, it was still an obviously pathetic set of qualifications to run a major federal agency, or even to supervise the 30 lawyers in a federal agency's general counsel's office.

It is a little shocking that none of the Senators who participated in the 42-minute confirmation hearing that Laura Rozen linked to yesterday made any note that even Brown's padded resume was empty of any actual disaster management, or any management at all at any level above that of a very small city a quarter century ago!

And the liability now should rest entirely with the White House. They were not tricked into hiring someone who lied about his qualifications. They made the appointment with a total lack of interest in any qualification other than loyalty, and as this article suggests, may have been complicit in the exaggeration.


Read the rest here.

It does make a rather convenient excuse now, but I am not sure if I agree that this is coming from the Bush Administration as some sort of cover for his firing.

It seems to me that Bush would have looked better simply firing the guy rather than admitting that he didn't bother to notice that the guy wasn't at all qualified to be the director of any federal agency, let alone one as vital in its purpose as FEMA.

Then again, maybe their right. Maybe in the twisted world in which the Bush administration operates, it is simply easier to say that this man lied on his resume and for that reason he must be let go, rather than admit is completely incompetent performance was criminal in its ineptitude.

Ultimately, as President, Bush owns Brown's failure even if we all know Brown was given the job as a political thank you rather than manipulating his way into the position by lying to his superiors about his qualifications.

The buck stops with Bush. End of Story.

Is the padded resume just a lame cover?

From Mark Schmitt via Talking Points Memo Cafe:

I wouldn't be surprised if some of the stories about FEMA Director Michael Brown's padded resume were being released for the sole purpose of giving some cover to the White House in firing him: "The President is extremely disappointed that Brownie, umm, Mr. Brown, represented himself as holding qualifications he did not hold, and the President will not tolerate anything other than complete forthrightness," Scotty will say, presenting the president as the Stockard Channing character in Six Degrees of Separation.

But it's actually more like Bernie Kerik's nonexistent "nanny problem" because, in reality, Brown's resume wasn't all that padded. Sure he changed "Assistant to the City Manager" to "Assistant City Manager," added a couple of honors he hadn't gotten, and made it sound like he'd been practicing some law when he hadn't. But a real resume padder adds a couple of degrees from Stanford and a stint in Special Forces.

The important point is this: Even if every single thing on Brown's resume was true, it was still an obviously pathetic set of qualifications to run a major federal agency, or even to supervise the 30 lawyers in a federal agency's general counsel's office.

It is a little shocking that none of the Senators who participated in the 42-minute confirmation hearing that Laura Rozen linked to yesterday made any note that even Brown's padded resume was empty of any actual disaster management, or any management at all at any level above that of a very small city a quarter century ago!

And the liability now should rest entirely with the White House. They were not tricked into hiring someone who lied about his qualifications. They made the appointment with a total lack of interest in any qualification other than loyalty, and as this article suggests, may have been complicit in the exaggeration.


Read the rest here.

It does make a rather convenient excuse now, but I am not sure if I agree that this is coming from the Bush Administration as some sort of cover for his firing.

It seems to me that Bush would have looked better simply firing the guy rather than admitting that he didn't bother to notice that the guy wasn't at all qualified to be the director of any federal agency, let alone one as vital in its purpose as FEMA.

Then again, maybe their right. Maybe in the twisted world in which the Bush administration operates, it is simply easier to say that this man lied on his resume and for that reason he must be let go, rather than admit is completely incompetent performance was criminal in its ineptitude.

Ultimately, as President, Bush owns Brown's failure even if we all know Brown was given the job as a political thank you rather than manipulating his way into the position by lying to his superiors about his qualifications.

The buck stops with Bush. End of Story.

EJ Dionne is once again the voice of common sense...

From today's Washington Post:

You can tell the White House knows how much trouble it is in -- that's no doubt why Bush had another news conference yesterday -- by following the Frank Theorem. "It's a rule in American politics," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), "that whichever side denounces the other for politicizing the issue is losing the argument." Bingo.

Once, the White House could use its surrogates to intimidate critics. Especially after Sept. 11, Democrats were concerned -- for both patriotic and opportunistic reasons -- that certain criticisms of Bush might be seen as "giving aid and comfort to the enemy." You can't be accused of giving aid and comfort to a hurricane.

This crisis has been an exceptionally clear lesson in this White House's overall approach: Try to get everyone to believe that any criticism of the president will blow back on the critics because Americans just don't like that sort of thing. Attack "finger-pointing," and make sure your allies madly point fingers at your opponents.

Say no one should play politics with a disaster -- and then make sure Republican leaders in Congress set up a commission to investigate the relief effort without asking Democrats for their input on how the investigation should be carried out.

Bush's critics aren't backing off, because they've been here before. Former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, who cooperated with Bush in the days after Sept. 11 but lost his South Dakota seat after a long, White House-inspired campaign accusing him of being "obstructionist," speaks from experience.

"Democrats to this day remain outraged at the blatant efforts that Republicans, especially in the administration, made to undermine the perception of our patriotism and our motivations," Daschle said in an interview.

This time around, Democrats won't be waved off by right-wing commentators or by contrived and insincere appeals to national unity. "I don't think we should pay a whit of attention to administration criticisms," Daschle said. "Democrats need to ask the hard questions and ignore the political attacks that are destined to come when we ask them."

The sounds of contention you are hearing are the sounds of accountability in a free republic. The president may not like it, but it is a refreshing sound.


Read the entire column here.

The truth is prevailing and it's a sight to behold...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

EJ Dionne is once again the voice of common sense...

From today's Washington Post:

You can tell the White House knows how much trouble it is in -- that's no doubt why Bush had another news conference yesterday -- by following the Frank Theorem. "It's a rule in American politics," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), "that whichever side denounces the other for politicizing the issue is losing the argument." Bingo.

Once, the White House could use its surrogates to intimidate critics. Especially after Sept. 11, Democrats were concerned -- for both patriotic and opportunistic reasons -- that certain criticisms of Bush might be seen as "giving aid and comfort to the enemy." You can't be accused of giving aid and comfort to a hurricane.

This crisis has been an exceptionally clear lesson in this White House's overall approach: Try to get everyone to believe that any criticism of the president will blow back on the critics because Americans just don't like that sort of thing. Attack "finger-pointing," and make sure your allies madly point fingers at your opponents.

Say no one should play politics with a disaster -- and then make sure Republican leaders in Congress set up a commission to investigate the relief effort without asking Democrats for their input on how the investigation should be carried out.

Bush's critics aren't backing off, because they've been here before. Former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, who cooperated with Bush in the days after Sept. 11 but lost his South Dakota seat after a long, White House-inspired campaign accusing him of being "obstructionist," speaks from experience.

"Democrats to this day remain outraged at the blatant efforts that Republicans, especially in the administration, made to undermine the perception of our patriotism and our motivations," Daschle said in an interview.

This time around, Democrats won't be waved off by right-wing commentators or by contrived and insincere appeals to national unity. "I don't think we should pay a whit of attention to administration criticisms," Daschle said. "Democrats need to ask the hard questions and ignore the political attacks that are destined to come when we ask them."

The sounds of contention you are hearing are the sounds of accountability in a free republic. The president may not like it, but it is a refreshing sound.


Read the entire column here.

The truth is prevailing and it's a sight to behold...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Mexican Navy helping relief effort...

Seeing that the Mexican Navy is in the gulf area helping with the recovery effort, it begs a question in my mind...

Mexico has a Navy?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Mexican Navy helping relief effort...

Seeing that the Mexican Navy is in the gulf area helping with the recovery effort, it begs a question in my mind...

Mexico has a Navy?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Chertoff Press Conference...

Chertoff is saying that FEMA needs to be prepared for disasters both natural and man-made and that Mike Brown is being called back to Washington to oversee FEMA Nationally once again, to assure that we are prepared and ready for anything that may come.

“When all is said and done, Hurricane Katrina will go down as the largest natural disaster in American History. Mike Brown has done everything he possibly could to coordinate this nearly impossible challenge.”

He is being replaced the disaster area by a Coast Guard Vice-Admiral who has a lot of experience, but Brown is staying to make sure that we’re prepared for what comes next.

I wish I were kidding.

Oh God, the questions and answers are even worse!

A reporter asked why Mr. Brown was not removed from the post:

Chertoff: As you know Mr. Brown is the director of FEMA. FEMA has not only the responsibility to deal with the Katrina recovery, but has other responsibilities as well. We’ve got tropical storms and hurricanes brewing. While it’s important to be focused on what’s happening on the ground here, we cannot let our guard down with respect to other things that might happen. Therefore I want to make sure FEMA continues to be run the way it needs to be, continues to be prepared for other challenges. I want to have the people here on the ground able to focus their full attention on what needs to be done with the recovery process…

Reporter: Is this the first step in Mr. Brown’s resignation? Can you answer that Mr. Brown please? And also, how do you respond to reports that you embellished your resume and there was the report in Time Magazine…

Chertoff: (interrupting) You heard the ground rules. I’m going to answer the questions. I’ve explained what we’re doing. I thought I was as clear as I possibly could be in English as to what I’m doing and why I’m doing it. Next Question…

I transcribed that using my TIVO. It’s a little rough, but it’s accurate.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Chertoff Press Conference...

Chertoff is saying that FEMA needs to be prepared for disasters both natural and man-made and that Mike Brown is being called back to Washington to oversee FEMA Nationally once again, to assure that we are prepared and ready for anything that may come.

“When all is said and done, Hurricane Katrina will go down as the largest natural disaster in American History. Mike Brown has done everything he possibly could to coordinate this nearly impossible challenge.”

He is being replaced the disaster area by a Coast Guard Vice-Admiral who has a lot of experience, but Brown is staying to make sure that we’re prepared for what comes next.

I wish I were kidding.

Oh God, the questions and answers are even worse!

A reporter asked why Mr. Brown was not removed from the post:

Chertoff: As you know Mr. Brown is the director of FEMA. FEMA has not only the responsibility to deal with the Katrina recovery, but has other responsibilities as well. We’ve got tropical storms and hurricanes brewing. While it’s important to be focused on what’s happening on the ground here, we cannot let our guard down with respect to other things that might happen. Therefore I want to make sure FEMA continues to be run the way it needs to be, continues to be prepared for other challenges. I want to have the people here on the ground able to focus their full attention on what needs to be done with the recovery process…

Reporter: Is this the first step in Mr. Brown’s resignation? Can you answer that Mr. Brown please? And also, how do you respond to reports that you embellished your resume and there was the report in Time Magazine…

Chertoff: (interrupting) You heard the ground rules. I’m going to answer the questions. I’ve explained what we’re doing. I thought I was as clear as I possibly could be in English as to what I’m doing and why I’m doing it. Next Question…

I transcribed that using my TIVO. It’s a little rough, but it’s accurate.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Michael Brown....

MSNBC is reporting that FEMA Director Michael Brown is being from "Operational Work" related to the Katrina Relief efforts, but will be allowed to retain his post as Director of FEMA.

WTF?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Michael Brown....

MSNBC is reporting that FEMA Director Michael Brown is being from "Operational Work" related to the Katrina Relief efforts, but will be allowed to retain his post as Director of FEMA.

WTF?

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Stay out of Gretna!

From Workbench:

Police Trapped Thousands in New Orleans

As the situation grew steadily worse in New Orleans last week, you might have wondered why people didn't just leave on foot. The Louisiana Superdome is less than two miles from a bridge that leads over the Mississippi River out of the city.

The answer: Any crowd that tried to do so was met by suburban police, some of whom fired guns to disperse the group and seized their water.



Read the rest here.

Wow...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Stay out of Gretna!

From Workbench:

Police Trapped Thousands in New Orleans

As the situation grew steadily worse in New Orleans last week, you might have wondered why people didn't just leave on foot. The Louisiana Superdome is less than two miles from a bridge that leads over the Mississippi River out of the city.

The answer: Any crowd that tried to do so was met by suburban police, some of whom fired guns to disperse the group and seized their water.



Read the rest here.

Wow...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Minimum wage makes it too expensive...

From Americablog:

BUSH SUSPENDS MINIMUM WAGE IN RECOVERY AREA - SLAVE LABOR WAGES HERE WE COME!
by Rob in Baltimore - 9/09/2005 11:41:00 AM



Just when I think that he can't get any worse, I read this on the White House Web site - an Executive Order eliminating the minimum wage in the affected areas:

(b) The wage rates imposed by section 3142 of title 40, United States Code, increase the cost to the Federal Government of providing Federal assistance to these areas.

(c) Suspension of the subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148, and the operation of related acts to the extent they depend upon the Secretary of Labor's determinations under section 3142 of title 40, United States Code, will result in greater assistance to these devastated communities and will permit the employment of thousands of additional individuals.
...
And, as to such contracts to be performed in such jurisdictions, I do hereby suspend, until otherwise provided, the provisions of any Executive Order, proclamation, rule, regulation, or other directive providing for the payment of wages, which provisions are dependent upon determinations by the Secretary of Labor under section 3142 of title 40, United States Code


Let me break that down for you. At a time of national crisis, and the President already having signed $61 BILLION in disaster relief, we as a nation can't afford to pay $9 an hour to laborers?

Of course we can.

This isn't about employing more people, this is a disgusting cash grab the likes of which has never been visited upon our nation. Didn't take long for this to happen, did it? They are the most inhuman corrupt bunch of assholes.

Like mother like son. Hey, those laborers have it pretty good down there! (HOMELESS and trying to rebuild their communities.) They don't need $9 an hour.

Just when I think that George Bush can't disgust me any more...


Absolutely Revolting...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Minimum wage makes it too expensive...

From Americablog:

BUSH SUSPENDS MINIMUM WAGE IN RECOVERY AREA - SLAVE LABOR WAGES HERE WE COME!
by Rob in Baltimore - 9/09/2005 11:41:00 AM



Just when I think that he can't get any worse, I read this on the White House Web site - an Executive Order eliminating the minimum wage in the affected areas:

(b) The wage rates imposed by section 3142 of title 40, United States Code, increase the cost to the Federal Government of providing Federal assistance to these areas.

(c) Suspension of the subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148, and the operation of related acts to the extent they depend upon the Secretary of Labor's determinations under section 3142 of title 40, United States Code, will result in greater assistance to these devastated communities and will permit the employment of thousands of additional individuals.
...
And, as to such contracts to be performed in such jurisdictions, I do hereby suspend, until otherwise provided, the provisions of any Executive Order, proclamation, rule, regulation, or other directive providing for the payment of wages, which provisions are dependent upon determinations by the Secretary of Labor under section 3142 of title 40, United States Code


Let me break that down for you. At a time of national crisis, and the President already having signed $61 BILLION in disaster relief, we as a nation can't afford to pay $9 an hour to laborers?

Of course we can.

This isn't about employing more people, this is a disgusting cash grab the likes of which has never been visited upon our nation. Didn't take long for this to happen, did it? They are the most inhuman corrupt bunch of assholes.

Like mother like son. Hey, those laborers have it pretty good down there! (HOMELESS and trying to rebuild their communities.) They don't need $9 an hour.

Just when I think that George Bush can't disgust me any more...


Absolutely Revolting...

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Day of Jubilee...

Things are quite exciting here in the Hippy Household. We learned this morning that the Hippy's Wife has officially passed the Bar Exam!

Woo-Hoo!

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Day of Jubilee...

Things are quite exciting here in the Hippy Household. We learned this morning that the Hippy's Wife has officially passed the Bar Exam!

Woo-Hoo!

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Tuesday, September 6, 2005

Imagine This, Mr. President...

This audio has apparently been floating around for a while, but I just came across it.

Download the 6 meg MP3 here.

Enjoy.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Imagine This, Mr. President...

This audio has apparently been floating around for a while, but I just came across it.

Download the 6 meg MP3 here.

Enjoy.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is a coward...

Rather than doing the honorable thing and telling the truth, he is cowardly spinning the most outrageous of lies to cover his boss's ass...

AmericaBlog has the story.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is a coward...

Rather than doing the honorable thing and telling the truth, he is cowardly spinning the most outrageous of lies to cover his boss's ass...

AmericaBlog has the story.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

What does FEMA stand for?

Rhandi Rhodes just nailed it...

FEMA: Failure to Effectively Manage Anything

-The Oklahoma Hippy

What does FEMA stand for?

Rhandi Rhodes just nailed it...

FEMA: Failure to Effectively Manage Anything

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Dan Froomkin nails the issue as usual...

I never cease to be thankful for Dan Froomkin's clarity.

From today's Washington Post Online:

Dealing With Political Disaster

By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Tuesday, September 6, 2005; 1:21 PM

President Bush somehow missed the significance of what was happening on the Gulf Coast last week as he and his political guru, Karl Rove, flitted between Texas and California and, finally, Washington.

But now, facing what is clearly a full-scale political disaster, Rove and a handful of other masterful political operatives have gone into overdrive. They are back in campaign mode.

This campaign is to salvage Bush's reputation.

Like previous Rove operations, it calls for multiple appearances by the president in controlled environments in which he can appear leader-like. It calls for extensive use of Air Force One and a massive deployment of spinners.

It doesn't necessarily include any change in policy. It certainly doesn't include any admission of error.

It utilizes the classic Rovian tactic of attacking critics rather than defending against their criticism -- and of throwing up chaff to muddle the issue and throw the press off the scent.

It calls for public expressions of outrage over the politicization of the issue and of those who would play the "blame game." While at the same time, it is utterly political in nature and heavily reliant on shifting the blame elsewhere.

But in some ways, this post-Katrina campaign poses Bush's aides with unprecedented challenges.

The problem -- an achingly slow federal response to what has turned out to be one of the greatest natural disasters this country has ever faced -- can be traced at least in part to one of the Bush White House's most defining characteristics: The protective bubble within which the president operates.

Bush's aides intentionally keep him mentally and physically aloof from any ugliness -- political or otherwise. It lets them keep tight control over the presidential imagery and stay on message.

But inside his bubble, Bush first failed to recognize what was becoming clear to almost anyone watching the news: That Americans needed help. And in his two meticulously staged visits to the Gulf Coast on Friday and Monday, it is precisely because Bush was kept so far away from dissension or mess that he appeared so out of touch.

He cracked jokes on Friday, including one about his drinking days in New Orleans, but has yet to confront the true horror of the situation so widely seen on TV. He has yet to acknowledge the disgrace of a major American city being rendered uninhabitable on his watch. He has yet to come face to face with people left to suffer for days in hellish conditions and explain to them why their government failed them. And he has yet to demonstrate the strength that Americans require from their president in a time of crisis.

This crisis finds the president looking impotent at best, incompetent at worst. And there is an element of whining to Bush's refusal to shoulder his responsibility -- especially should the press continue to make it clear how intensely he and his top aides are trying to pass the buck.

The men behind Bush's bubble are clearly hoping that their tried and true methods will serve them well yet again and that over time, Bush's reputation will recover.

But with every body removed from the attics of New Orleans over the coming weeks, America will remember the colossal failure of government to protect its people.


Read the full text here.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Dan Froomkin nails the issue as usual...

I never cease to be thankful for Dan Froomkin's clarity.

From today's Washington Post Online:

Dealing With Political Disaster

By Dan Froomkin
Special to washingtonpost.com
Tuesday, September 6, 2005; 1:21 PM

President Bush somehow missed the significance of what was happening on the Gulf Coast last week as he and his political guru, Karl Rove, flitted between Texas and California and, finally, Washington.

But now, facing what is clearly a full-scale political disaster, Rove and a handful of other masterful political operatives have gone into overdrive. They are back in campaign mode.

This campaign is to salvage Bush's reputation.

Like previous Rove operations, it calls for multiple appearances by the president in controlled environments in which he can appear leader-like. It calls for extensive use of Air Force One and a massive deployment of spinners.

It doesn't necessarily include any change in policy. It certainly doesn't include any admission of error.

It utilizes the classic Rovian tactic of attacking critics rather than defending against their criticism -- and of throwing up chaff to muddle the issue and throw the press off the scent.

It calls for public expressions of outrage over the politicization of the issue and of those who would play the "blame game." While at the same time, it is utterly political in nature and heavily reliant on shifting the blame elsewhere.

But in some ways, this post-Katrina campaign poses Bush's aides with unprecedented challenges.

The problem -- an achingly slow federal response to what has turned out to be one of the greatest natural disasters this country has ever faced -- can be traced at least in part to one of the Bush White House's most defining characteristics: The protective bubble within which the president operates.

Bush's aides intentionally keep him mentally and physically aloof from any ugliness -- political or otherwise. It lets them keep tight control over the presidential imagery and stay on message.

But inside his bubble, Bush first failed to recognize what was becoming clear to almost anyone watching the news: That Americans needed help. And in his two meticulously staged visits to the Gulf Coast on Friday and Monday, it is precisely because Bush was kept so far away from dissension or mess that he appeared so out of touch.

He cracked jokes on Friday, including one about his drinking days in New Orleans, but has yet to confront the true horror of the situation so widely seen on TV. He has yet to acknowledge the disgrace of a major American city being rendered uninhabitable on his watch. He has yet to come face to face with people left to suffer for days in hellish conditions and explain to them why their government failed them. And he has yet to demonstrate the strength that Americans require from their president in a time of crisis.

This crisis finds the president looking impotent at best, incompetent at worst. And there is an element of whining to Bush's refusal to shoulder his responsibility -- especially should the press continue to make it clear how intensely he and his top aides are trying to pass the buck.

The men behind Bush's bubble are clearly hoping that their tried and true methods will serve them well yet again and that over time, Bush's reputation will recover.

But with every body removed from the attics of New Orleans over the coming weeks, America will remember the colossal failure of government to protect its people.


Read the full text here.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Tim Russert on Imus this morning...

They debate the most fundamental of questions

Was what happened in New Orleans the product of racism or incompetence?

Tim blasted Bush for saying he didn't know the levees could be breached. He said, " The roll of the government is to protect its people." Tim also brought up one of the biggest factors of all. After 9/11 and the communications problems between the policeman and fireman, was a big factor in so many deaths. This President pledged in their honor never to let that happen again. What have they been doing for four years? Imus brought up the racial angle wondering if Beverly Hills had been hit how would the response be. "...the right people didn't care enougha bout those people period."


Crooks and Liars had the video. Here's the link.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Tim Russert on Imus this morning...

They debate the most fundamental of questions

Was what happened in New Orleans the product of racism or incompetence?

Tim blasted Bush for saying he didn't know the levees could be breached. He said, " The roll of the government is to protect its people." Tim also brought up one of the biggest factors of all. After 9/11 and the communications problems between the policeman and fireman, was a big factor in so many deaths. This President pledged in their honor never to let that happen again. What have they been doing for four years? Imus brought up the racial angle wondering if Beverly Hills had been hit how would the response be. "...the right people didn't care enougha bout those people period."


Crooks and Liars had the video. Here's the link.

-The Oklahoma Hippy

Monday, September 5, 2005

Keith Olberman on Bush...

SECAUCUS — Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff said it all, starting his news briefing Saturday afternoon: "Louisiana is a city that is largely underwater..."
Well there's your problem right there.

If ever a slip-of-the-tongue defined a government's response to a crisis, this was it.

The seeming definition of our time and our leaders had been their insistence on slashing federal budgets for projects that might’ve saved New Orleans. The seeming characterization of our government that it was on vacation when the city was lost, and could barely tear itself away from commemorating V.J. Day and watching Monty Python's Flying Circus, to at least pretend to get back to work. The seeming identification of these hapless bureaucrats: their pathetic use of the future tense in terms of relief they could’ve brought last Monday and Tuesday — like the President, whose statements have looked like they’re being transmitted to us by some kind of four-day tape-delay.

But no. The incompetence and the ludicrous prioritization will forever be symbolized by one gaffe by of the head of what is ironically called “The Department of Homeland Security”: “Louisiana is a city…”

Politician after politician — Republican and Democrat alike — has paraded before us, unwilling or unable to shut off the "I-Me" switch in their heads, condescendingly telling us about how moved they were or how devastated they were — congenitally incapable of telling the difference between the destruction of a city and the opening of a supermarket.

And as that sorry recital of self-absorption dragged on, I have resisted editorial comment. The focus needed to be on the efforts to save the stranded — even the internet's meager powers were correctly devoted to telling the stories of the twin disasters, natural... and government-made.

But now, at least, it is has stopped getting exponentially worse in Mississippi and Alabama and New Orleans and Louisiana (the state, not the city). And, having given our leaders what we know now is the week or so they need to get their act together, that period of editorial silence I mentioned, should come to an end.

No one is suggesting that mayors or governors in the afflicted areas, nor the federal government, should be able to stop hurricanes. Lord knows, no one is suggesting that we should ever prioritize levee improvement for a below-sea-level city, ahead of $454 million worth of trophy bridges for the politicians of Alaska.

But, nationally, these are leaders who won re-election last year largely by portraying their opponents as incapable of keeping the country safe. These are leaders who regularly pressure the news media in this country to report the reopening of a school or a power station in Iraq, and defies its citizens not to stand up and cheer. Yet they couldn't even keep one school or power station from being devastated by infrastructure collapse in New Orleans — even though the government had heard all the "chatter" from the scientists and city planners and hurricane centers and some group whose purposes the government couldn't quite discern... a group called The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

And most chillingly of all, this is the Law and Order and Terror government. It promised protection — or at least amelioration — against all threats: conventional, radiological, or biological.

It has just proved that it cannot save its citizens from a biological weapon called standing water.

Mr. Bush has now twice insisted that, "we are not satisfied," with the response to the manifold tragedies along the Gulf Coast. I wonder which "we" he thinks he's speaking for on this point. Perhaps it's the administration, although we still don't know where some of them are. Anybody seen the Vice President lately? The man whose message this time last year was, 'I'll Protect You, The Other Guy Will Let You Die'?

I don't know which 'we' Mr. Bush meant.

For many of this country's citizens, the mantra has been — as we were taught in Social Studies it should always be — whether or not I voted for this President — he is still my President. I suspect anybody who had to give him that benefit of the doubt stopped doing so last week. I suspect a lot of his supporters, looking ahead to '08, are wondering how they can distance themselves from the two words which will define his government — our government — "New Orleans."

For him, it is a shame — in all senses of the word. A few changes of pronouns in there, and he might not have looked so much like a 21st Century Marie Antoinette. All that was needed was just a quick "I'm not satisfied with my government's response." Instead of hiding behind phrases like "no one could have forseen," had he only remembered Winston Churchill's quote from the 1930's. "The responsibility," of government, Churchill told the British Parliament "for the public safety is absolute and requires no mandate. It is in fact, the prime object for which governments come into existence."

In forgetting that, the current administration did not merely damage itself — it damaged our confidence in our ability to rely on whoever is in the White House.

As we emphasized to you here all last week, the realities of the region are such that New Orleans is going to be largely uninhabitable for a lot longer than anybody is yet willing to recognize. Lord knows when the last body will be found, or the last artifact of the levee break, dug up. Could be next March. Could be 2100. By then, in the muck and toxic mire of New Orleans, they may even find our government's credibility.

Somewhere, in the City of Louisiana.


Wow.

-The Oklahoma Hippy